Author: Riet van den Ende, Progressive Legal
Author: Riet van den Ende, Progressive Legal
Once registered, your trademark is a powerful tool that plays an important role in protecting your business, building your brand recognition, and establishing market presence. In Australia, the trademark oppositions system provide a means for interested parties to challenge either the registration of a trademark or the application for removal of a registered trade mark.
As a trade mark owner, you may need to file a trade mark opposition in order to preserve your rights or receive one against your trade mark application or your application for removal of a registered trade mark. In either case, it is essential to know the “ins and outs” of trademark oppositions.
On this page, we’ll provide a comprehensive guide on trademark oppositions, exploring how the process works and what it means for your brand.
Trademark oppositions are initiated by third parties to formally challenge either:
An opposition against the registration of another trade mark may be filed if someone believes a pending trade mark application will hurt or compromise the integrity of their brand. This type of opposition can be filed with IP Australia after a trademark application has been accepted but before it has been officially registered.
An opposition against an application for removal of a registered trade mark may be filed if someone believes a registered trade mark has not been used for several years or was filed in bad faith.
This system serves as a mechanism for protecting the integrity of the trademark registration process by promoting fair competition and safeguarding the rights of trademark owners.
If you have found a pending trade mark that is strikingly similar to yours and is offering the same or similar goods and services, you should strongly consider filing a trade mark opposition. Pending trade marks can be found in the Australian Official Journal of Trademarks. IP Australia may or may not notify third parties that a trade mark relevant to their own has been accepted for registration, but this should not be relied upon. Best to consider engaging us for our trade mark monitoring service.
Once a trade mark has been accepted for registration by IP Australia, you only have 2 months to lodge an opposition from the date of that acceptance. In some circumstances, this time frame may be extended if an extension is requested, but don’t count on it.
Or, if you are already the owner of a pending or registered trade mark and have received a notice from IP Australia that someone applied to remove your trade mark from the Australian Trade Marks Register, you have 2 months to lodge an opposition against this removal action.
If someone decides they would like to oppose a pending trade mark or the removal of a registered trade mark, they will need to file a Notice of Intention to Oppose. A filing fee of $250 will need to be paid to IP Australia to oppose a pending trade mark – there are no official fees to oppose an application for removal of a trade mark. . A copy of the Notice of Intention to Oppose will be sent to the trade mark applicant or removal applicant, alerting them of the annexed deadline below.
Within one month of filing the Notice of Intention to Oppose, the opponent must file a Statement of Grounds and Particulars with IP Australia. The purpose of this is to provide a legal foundation for the opposition that states any reasons why they believe that the opposition should succeed. These reasons are known as grounds, and they must be chosen from a list of available grounds for opposition which can be found in Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth). This statement may also give you the opportunity to apply for an award of costs, if you are the successful party.
The opponent must include the relevant grounds they have nominated and provide supporting information for each of them.
For more information on this stage of the process, check out our article on Statements of Grounds and Particulars.
If both parties mutually consent, a request for a cooling off period can be submitted by the parties. This is used if the parties are involved in negotiations of settling the dispute before proceeding to the more complex and costly stages of the process. The cooling off period is usually 6 months but this may be extended to 12 months if necessary.
If no cooling off period if requested, the proceedings will continue. After one month of receiving the Statement of Grounds and Particulars, the applicant or removal applicant should file a Notice of Intention to Defend with IP Australia. This is to demonstrate that they would like to defend their trade mark application or application for removal of a trade mark. If they do not file a Notice of Intention to Defend, the opposition will automatically be considered as successful, and the opposed application or challenged trade mark will be removed.
The opponent should file Evidence in Support within three months of receiving the Notice of Intention to Defend. This is used to provide evidence for the grounds in their Statement of Grounds and Particulars. All evidence is filed in the form of statutory declarations. Examples of possible evidence may include past correspondence, business records, photos, and witness statements.
The applicant or removal applicant should file Evidence in Answer within three months of receiving the Evidence in Support. In cases where the opponent has not filed evidence in support, the applicant or removal applicant should respond to the Statement of Grounds and Particulars. This should be done within three months of being notified that the Evidence in Support was not filed. All evidence must be in the form of statutory declarations. The applicant or removal applicant should directly respond to each ground presented by the opponent and provide as much evidence as possible to support their case.
The opponent should file Evidence in Reply within two months of receiving the Evidence in Answer. The opponent may only respond to issues raised in the Evidence in Answer. No new issues should be presented.
After all the evidence is filed and exchanged, IP Australia will decide on the final outcome. Either party can request a hearing on the trade mark opposition. Otherwise, the decision will be made on written record.
If a hearing is requested, these can be held online via conferencing platforms or in very rare circumstances, in person in Canberra. A hearing must be requested within one month after Evidence in Reply has been submitted. There is a $400 fee to request a hearing and any attending party will be required to pay additional hearing fees for each day they appear at the hearing. Both parties are expected to prepare written submissions to aid the Hearing Officer’s decision. The final decision is typically given within three months after the hearing, but this varies depending on individual circumstances.
An award of costs is usually issued against the unsuccessful party. An unrepresented party will struggle to obtain an award of costs in the same way as a represented person. Unrepresented parties can only obtain the award of costs if they can prove they paid fees for obtaining advice during the proceeding. Costs are awarded according to the Trade Mark regulations 1995.
We know this process may seem daunting and complex but our experienced trade mark team know how to navigate you through it. If you need help in relation to the process of trade mark oppositions, make an enquiry below.
Your opposition must be supported by at least one of the grounds set out in the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth). Some of the most common grounds to oppose a pending trade mark application are included in this table below.
Capacity to Distinguish [Section 41 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)] |
|
The trade mark is scandalous or contrary to law
[Section 42 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)] |
|
Likely to cause Confusion
[Section 43 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)] |
|
No intention of use
[Section 59 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)] |
|
Similar to another trade mark that has acquired reputation
[Section 60 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)] |
|
Bad Faith
[Section 62A Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)] |
|
For an opposition against the removal of a trademark, the grounds relied upon consist of the same grounds used by the removal applicant.
Trade mark oppositions allow interested parties to voice their concerns and prevent potentially conflicting trademarks from being registered or prevent existing trade marks from being removed by others.
Trade mark oppositions can become immensely complex, and it is important to seek legal advice when dealing with them. If you need help with trade mark oppositions, feel free to contact us at Progressive Legal. We have a skilled team of Trade Mark Lawyers that are happy to help with any questions you may have. All you need to do is make an enquiry below, fill out our contact form on this page or contact our office at 1800 820 083.
Trademark oppositions are not limited to solely new registrations for trade marks, though they are the most common. You may oppose an application for an amendment to an existing trade mark. You may also oppose an application for the removal of a trade mark if it is not being used.
It is crucial you adhere to the two-month deadline to ensure that your opposition is considered valid. If you wait too long, your opposition must then be made through proceedings in the Federal Court. This is much more costly, lengthy and follows stricter rules regarding evidence requirements and procedures. You want to avoid this at all costs.
You may be able to request an extension of time during the opposition process, however, this will involve paying a fee. It costs $150 per month for each extension to file a:
Remember, extensions are not always guaranteed and are only available in certain circumstances. It is up to the discretion of IP Australia to accept or reject them. Never rely on extensions and always try to adhere to the set timeframes for each document to avoid costs and disappointment.
You may have seen the term, ‘priority date’ in this article and wondered… what does that mean?
This is the date when a business first files their trade mark application to IP Australia. It is relevant when establishing if another trade mark has acquired a reputation before the application of a new trade mark.
The opposition decision is not final, and you may be able to appeal to the Federal Court. This process, however, is not easy. It will be very expensive and very lengthy, and should be avoided if you are not exceptionally confident in your case.
Please get in touch with us today via phone or the contact form on this page.