Online Defamation in Australia

Author: Ian Aldridge, Progressive Legal

Online defamation, especially in Australia, has been a significant worry for both individuals and companies. The emergence of social media platforms, review sites, and communication channels that operate in real-time has made it possible for defamatory comments to be spread quickly and to cause a great deal of damage to a person’s good name. The expression “online defamation” is pretty much understood by everybody now, particularly those who have felt the brunt of a negative post or review that has been quickly shared on the web. Since damage to a reputation can be very serious and last for a long time, it is crucial to have an understanding of your rights as well as the legal remedies that are available to you in case there is defamatory content online.

The rise of online defamation with social media

Social media has changed the way we interact, but it has also made it easier for defamation to spread quickly and to a large extent. A negative review on a business page, a deceitful comment in a community group or a provocative post on platforms like Facebook or Instagram can, within a very short period of time, cause serious reputational damage.

Since online content can be shared, screenshotted and viewed by a large number of people instantly, a harmful statement can be delivered to hundreds or thousands of people before you even find out about it. This rapid amplification is what makes social media the most common place for online defamation.

If you are the one who is subjected to false or damaging allegations, the main question that comes to your mind is undoubtedly: what steps can you take to protect yourself and your reputation?

For information on social media defamation, click here.

Online defamation legal protections under the Defamation Act 2005

Fortunately, there are legal safeguards in place to protect those affected by defamation. In Australia, the Defamation Act 2005 serves as a crucial tool for individuals and some small businesses seeking recourse.

Specifically, the Act provides that small corporations, defined as those with fewer than 10 employees and not part of a larger corporate structure or formed for non-financial gain, may have a cause of action for defamation.

This legal provision underscores the importance of understanding your rights and the protective measures available under Australian law.

Prevention: the best strategy against online defamation

If someone has defamed you via online communication, you can go to court by legal means, but these methods are costly, time-consuming and stressful. The best method is to take issues off the table entirely. So, making sure that your online communication, whether it is personal or on behalf of a business, cannot able to be considered as injurious or defamatory to another person’s reputation is what this is about.

Using prevention as a legal shield will keep you away from court cases and also help to create a safer, more respectful and more positive online community. When you are careful with your posts and think about how others may see them, you lessen the danger of defamation lawsuits, and you are at the same time safeguarding your own and other people’s reputations.

Recognising online defamation

Understanding what constitutes online defamation is key to preventing it. Here are examples of actions that could be deemed defamatory:

1. Making false accusations of criminal activity against someone;

2. Accusing someone of unethical behaviour without evidence;

3. Spreading rumours about someone’s personal life; 

4. Making false statements about someone’s professional qualifications; 

5. Falsely attributing negative statements or actions to someone; 

6. Misrepresenting someone’s views or opinions; 

7. Publishing doctored or manipulated images or videos to defame someone; 

8. Creating fake online profiles or impersonating someone to defame them;  

9. Making false claims about someone’s financial status or business practices; 

10. Publishing private or confidential information about someone without their consent; 

11. Using derogatory or discriminatory language to describe someone; 

12. Accusing someone of having a mental illness without evidence; 

13. Spreading false information about someone’s health or medical history; 

14., Making false claims about someone’s involvement in a controversial issue; 

15. Publishing false information about someone’s educational background; 

16. Accusing someone of illegal or unethical conduct without evidence; 

17. Making false claims about someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity; 

18. Spreading false information about someone’s political views or affiliations; 

19. Making false claims about someone’s involvement in criminal activity; 

20. Accusing someone of being dishonest or untrustworthy without evidence; 

21. Accusing someone of being involved in a conspiracy without evidence; 

22. Making false claims about someone’s past or present romantic relationships; 

23. Spreading false information about someone’s nationality or ethnicity; 

24. Accusing someone of plagiarism without evidence; 

25. Making false claims about someone’s membership in a particular group or organization; 

26. Spreading rumours about someone’s financial problems or bankruptcy; 

27. Making false statements about someone’s involvement in a controversial issue; 

28. Accusing someone of criminal behaviour based on circumstantial evidence; 

29. Spreading false information about someone’s family background; 

30. Making false claims about someone’s immigration status; 

31. Accusing someone of involvement in a cult or extremist group without evidence; 

32. Publishing false information about someone’s employment history; 

33. Spreading rumours about someone’s personal hygiene or appearance; 

34. Making false claims about someone’s political affiliation; 

35. Accusing someone of being a liar or fraud without evidence; 

36. Spreading false information about someone’s religious beliefs or practices; 

37. Making false claims about someone’s involvement in a scandal or controversy; 

38. Accusing someone of being involved in a cover-up without evidence; 

39. Spreading rumours about someone’s mental health or psychological state;  

40. Making false claims about an individual which causes them to lose their job. 

These examples highlight the broad spectrum of actions that can lead to defamation charges. The implications of such actions are not to be taken lightly, as they can result in significant harm to individuals and businesses alike.

Navigating online defamation

The importance of being mindful of our online interactions can’tbe overstated. Online defamation, while a significant concern, can be mitigated through informed and considerate communication practices. For businesses and individuals alike, understanding the legal protections available and prioritising prevention over litigation is crucial.

The era of social media has brought with it incredible opportunities for connection and growth, but it also requires a new level of responsibility in how we communicate and conduct ourselves online. By fostering a culture of respect and understanding, we can work towards minimising the instances of online defamation and its impacts on our personal and professional lives.

Key takeaways

Need Dispute Resolution Advice?

Please get in touch with us today via phone or the contact form on this page.

1800 820 083