Liquidated Damages in Contracts

Author: Zeinab Farhat, Progressive Legal

In the complex world of contracts, parties often face uncertainties regarding the potential damages that may arise from a breach of contract.

How can they accurately quantify the financial implications of non-performance or delays? This is where the concept of liquidated damages comes into play. Serving as a crucial contractual tool, they provide parties with a predetermined measure of compensation in the event of a breach, ensuring fairness, certainty, and efficiency in resolving disputes.

Whether you are a business owner, contractor, or legal professional, understanding the purpose and intricacies of liquidated damages is essential for navigating the complexities of contractual relationships.  

What are liquidated damages? 

Liquidated damages (also known as agreed damages clause) are pre–determined amounts of money specified in a contract that parties agree to pay in the event of a breach or failure to perform a contractual obligation as stipulated in the contract.

These damages are intended to provide compensation to the non-breaching party for the losses incurred due to the breach and quantifies that amount in advance of the breach occurring. In other words, rather than requiring the injured party to prove the actual damages suffered, liquidated damages offer a predetermined measure of compensation that both parties have agreed upon in advance.

Liquidated damages serve as a fair approximation of losses in cases where it is challenging to determine the exact amount of actual damages. 

What is a liquidated damages clause?

Liquidated damages clauses are included in commercial contracts to address the possibility of breaches. At its core, a liquidated damages clause establishes that a party who fails to fulfill their contractual obligations must provide a specified sum as compensation for the breach.  

This amount is established in advance and explicitly stated within the contract. These clauses may also be referred to as ‘‘stipulated damages’, and ‘pre-estimated damages’.  

What are the advantages of liquidated damages? 

The following are advantages of liquidated damages: 

Certainty

Liquidated damages clauses bring certainty to the parties involved by establishing a predetermined amount or method for calculating damages in case of a breach. This eliminates the need for lengthy and costly legal proceedings to determine the actual losses suffered. Parties can enter into contracts with the assurance that, in the event of a breach, there is a clear framework for assessing damages. 

Risk allocation

Liquidated damages help allocate risk between the contracting parties. By agreeing upon a fixed sum or a calculation method in advance, the parties can assess and account for the potential financial consequences of a breach when negotiating and entering the contract. It allows parties to make informed decisions based on the anticipated costs associated with non-performance or delays. 

Compensation

Liquidated damages aim to compensate the non-breaching party for the harm or loss suffered because of the breach. They provide a remedy that reflects a reasonable estimate of the damages at the time of contract formation. It offers a form of restitution and financial redress to the injured party. It helps offset the negative impact of the breach and restores them to a position that they would have been in if the breach had not occurred. 

Efficiency

By incorporating liquidated damages clauses, parties can promote efficiency in contract enforcement. The clause enables a streamlined process for resolving disputes and seeking compensation. It reduces the need for complex and time-consuming litigation to establish the quantum of damages, allowing parties to focus on resolving the breach and moving forward. 

Incentives for performance

Liquidated damages also serve as an incentive for the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations or meet specified deadlines. The prospect of paying a predetermined amount of damages can encourage timely and satisfactory performance, discouraging potential breaches and promoting compliance with contractual terms. 

Avoidance of disproportionate damages

Liquidated damages clauses provide a safeguard against disproportionate or excessive damages. By agreeing on a predetermined amount or calculation method, parties can prevent the risk of one party seeking an unreasonably high amount of damages that does not reflect the actual harm suffered. This promotes fairness and prevents unjust enrichment or punitive outcomes. 

Preserving relationships

In certain cases, the inclusion of a liquidated damages clause can help preserve relationships between parties. By providing a predetermined measure of compensation, it eliminates the need for protracted negotiations or disputes over damages. This can help maintain a level of trust and goodwill between the parties, allowing them to focus on fulfilling their contractual obligations and continuing their business relationship. 

What are the elements of a liquidated damages clause? 

The key elements of a liquidated damages clause include: 

1. Practical completion

Practical completion is a crucial term within a liquidated damages clause. It refers to the stage in which the contracted work has been substantially completed and is ready for its intended use or occupation.

It signifies that the project is finished to a functional and operational level, although there may still be minor defects or outstanding items that need to be addressed. The definition of practical completion should be clearly defined within the contract, providing specific criteria that can be objectively assessed to determine when it has been achieved. 

2. Date for practical completion

The practical completion date is typically specified in the contract and serves as a reference point for determining whether the contractor has met their obligations within the agreed timeframe.

It is crucial for the date for practical completion to be clearly stated in the contract to avoid ambiguity. It may be presented in the form of a fixed date, number of days from the contract date or triggered by a particular event.  

If practical completion is achieved by the specified date, the contractor is generally not liable for liquidated damages associated with delays occurring before that point. However, if practical completion is delayed beyond the agreed timeframe, the damages clause may come into effect.  

3. Date of practical completion

The date of practical completion is the actual date on which practical completion is achieved. It is important to have a mechanism in place to establish and prove the date of practical completion. The contract should outline the specific requirements for establishing the date of practical completion to ensure transparency.  

4. Applicable rate

The applicable rate refers to the predetermined rate of liquidated damages that will be payable by the contractor for the period between the date for practical completion and the actual date of completion.

This rate is usually expressed as a fixed sum per time period, such as per day, week, or month. The contract should clearly specify the applicable rate to provide certainty regarding the amount of damages that will be assessed for each day or period of delay beyond the agreed practical completion date. 

5. Liquidated damages

When fixing the liquidated damages amount, the actual quantification of the damages amount is a commercial decision for the parties to consider. For example, the party who is receiving the debt should consider the potential financial costs associated with a breach and propose an amount based on that.  

Where can you find a liquidated damages clause? 

Liquidated damages clauses are found in many types of commercial contracts. They most commonly appear in the following:  

Construction contracts

Generally, these clauses establish that in the event of a contractor’s breach causing a delay in completion, the contractor will be responsible for paying the employer a predetermined sum for each day, week, or month that the delay persists. 

IT contracts

Where there may be project delays, data breaches, security incidents or intellectual property infringements, contractors may be liable to pay liquidated damages.  

Service level agreements

When a service provider fails to meet specified performance standards or deadlines, they may be liable to pay damages to the client.  

Real estate contracts

In situations where buyers do not complete purchases or tenants breach agreements, they may be liable to pay liquidated damages.  

Employment contracts

They are typically used to address specific situations where the employer may suffer financial harm due to the actions or breaches of an employee.  

When is a liquidated damages clause enforceable? 

The enforceability of a liquidated damages clause depends on whether the specified sum amounts to a penalty. If the court determines that a damages clause constitutes a penalty for the party in breach, the court will not enforce the clause. The agreed upon sum must represent a genuine estimate of the losses a party would be likely to suffer because of the breach.  

Considering whether a clause is a penalty or not is a complex area of law, but at a general level, a key distinction between a liquidated damages clause and a penalty is that the latter operates as a punishment by imposing an additional liability upon breach and is generally out of proportion to the legitimate interests of the non affected party.  

The liquidated damages clause should incorporate a clear and precise formula for calculating the damages. These damages should accrue at specified intervals, such as daily, weekly, or monthly. By including a well-defined formula, the clause ensures that the damages awarded correspond reasonably to the harm caused by the breach or non-performance.

It is important to avoid stipulating a lump sum unless the circumstances permit the parties to accurately calculate an appropriate amount easily. This prevents the liquidated damages clause from becoming a punitive or unjust mechanism, and instead encourages an equitable outcome that reflects the actual loss incurred. 

Case example: Grocon Constructors (Qld) Pty Ltd v Juniper Developer No 2 Pty Ltd

In the case, Grocon Constructors (Qld) Pty Ltd v Juniper Developer No 2 Pty Ltd, the Queensland Supreme Court was required to determine whether a liquidated damages clause contained in a construction contract was a penalty or not.  

Juniper entered into a contract with Grocon to handle the construction of a development project. However, disputes arose between the two parties, resulting in legal action. Grocon filed a lawsuit against Juniper, claiming non-payment for their work and costs incurred due to delays. In response, Juniper countersued, invoking the liquidated damages clause. The clause was invoked by Grocon’s failure to reach practical completion by the specified date under each part of the project. 

The court ultimately upheld the liquidated damages clause and found that it was not a penalty. In order for a clause to be considered a penalty, it must be deemed “extravagant or unconscionable in amount” or grossly disproportionate, rather than simply lacking proportionality.  

Unfair contract terms  

When drafting liquidated damages, it is also important to consider the applicability of the unfair contracts regime as provided for under the Australian Consumer Law. If a liquidated damages clause is deemed “unfair” then in addition to declaring that the term is void, significant civil pecuniary penalties may apply.  

What is the difference between liquidated damages and unliquidated damages? 

In cases where the parties have not included a liquidated damages clause or where the clause is deemed unenforceable, the injured party may seek unliquidated damages through a legal proceeding.  

Unlike liquidated damages, which involve a specific sum agreed upon by the parties in advance, unliquidated damages are not explicitly stated or quantified in the contract. Instead, they are determined by a court or an arbitrator based on the actual losses suffered by the injured party as a result of a breach.  

The process of seeking unliquidated damages can be more time-consuming, complex, and uncertain compared to the enforcement of liquidated damages. 

Key takeaways 

Liquidated damages play a crucial role in the complex world of contracts by providing parties with a predetermined measure of compensation in the event of a breach. It is essential to have a comprehensive understanding of how liquidated damages work and their implications when entering into a commercial contract with a liquidated damages clause.  

In order to address your specific circumstances and obtain tailored guidance on liquidated damages clauses, do not hesitate to reach out to us at Progressive Legal. Simply make an online enquiry below or give us a call on 1800 820 083 and connect with our experienced commercial lawyers today.

Need Commercial Advice?

Please get in touch with us today via phone or the contact form on this page.

1800 820 083